Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: K2AV Counterpoise

To: Dan Maguire <djm2150@yahoo.com>, Topband@contesting.com, k8bhz@alphacomm.net
Subject: Re: Topband: K2AV Counterpoise
From: "k8bhz@alphacomm.net" <k8bhz@alphacomm.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:47:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Dan,

I can see where you've reached your conclusion, but your comment that "Rudy seems to say..." is a good qualifier.

Let's get back to basics, say with a classic 1/4 WL vertical. The theoretical impedance against an in infinite ground is 36 ohms. From free space modeling, one quickly realizes that this is nothing more half of a free space dipole, which it is. Next, power being fed into the base is simply: P = I squared X R radiation, at resonance. Very simply, more current means more power. Now with any radial system, screen, or ground rod, or counterpoise, that current into the base HAS to come from the ground system. There can be NO discontinuity here...it's not electrically possible.

Now let's look at the ELECTRICAL length of a radial. The one given is that the far end is open-circuited, I think we all agree so far...That means that for standing wave purposes, current here must be zero (the wire stops!), so impedance is highest. At the antenna end of the radial, impedance reaches a minimum at 1/4 ELECTRICAL WL, and increases back to the reflected maximum at 1/2 ELECTRICAL W/L. Notice please that ELECTRICAL WL is extended by Vp, same as shortening a PHYSICAL piece of coax to make a phasing line or tuned stub. To recap this, the impedance presented at the antenna end of a radial varies from a minimum at 1/4 ELECTRICAL WL to a maximum at 1/2 ELECTRICAL WL. (And multiples of these lengths, of course).

The error of your conclusion comes from the fact that Rudy is comparing equal currents INTO the radials, Which means that the POWER into the antenna is NOT constant. POWER is at a minimum to achieve the fixed current value at 1/4 WL, and goes to a maximum at 1/2 WL. A verification is when he increases radial length and the current maximum becomes greater than at the base of the antenna....more power into the antenna, more power in the radial standing wave current peak, and more losses.

In our real world, our transmitters/amplifiers are fixed in power output, not infinitely variable, so as the combined vertical/ground system impedance goes up, current decreases. Recall, radiated power is P = I squared X R radiation. This obviously reaches a minimum as the impedance hits it's maximum, at 1/2 ELECTRICAL WL. Rudy's summations/conclusions reflect this.

Sorry for being so long-winded.

Brian  K8BHZ


On 10/26/2017 11:47 PM, Dan Maguire via Topband wrote:
K8BHZ wrote:
The length to avoid is nothing more than a half wavelength, which translates 
the same impedance from end to end
i.e., the high Z open end translates to a high Z antenna base end. This results 
in minimum radial current.
I'm not so sure I buy that and I don't think N6LF does either.  If you look at the 
section "An Explanation for the Dips in Ga" (Part 1, QEX pg 40) in Rudy's 
document

http://rudys.typepad.com/files/qex-mar-apr-2012.pdf

you'll find this: ["L" is the variable for radial length]

<quote N6LF>
... For the same current at the feed point, with longer radials the currents are much 
higher as we go out from the base. We would expect these higher currents to increase 
both E and H-field intensities at ground level under the radials. ... Since the power 
dissipation in the soil will vary with the square of the field intensity, it’s 
pretty clear why the efficiency takes such a large dip when the radials are too long.
</quote>

So Rudy seems to be saying that the increased loss is due to higher radial 
currents, not minimum radial currents.
    Below is a different animation, this time showing E-field intensity as the radial length changes. For this animation the radial height was 10 ft so the dip occurs at ~0.45 WL (frame 9). That corresponds to the highest radial current and the max E-field.


Dan, AC6LA


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>