Another fellow pressed me on this. What I should have said - that
perhaps is more clear - goes like this.
1. Worry about your own operation --> because you can control it.
2. No point to worry about the other guy --> because you almost
certainly have no control over it.
3. Point #2 does not in any way detract from what your personal views
are. Point #2 is NOT saying anything about the "rightness" of any ham
operation practice.
If the guy asked me "can i use my web sdr to hear you better?" - Sure,
I'm going to say "let's do it the old school way." But they don't
ask... And I would be willing to bet they don't advertise either. I'm
just going to log the QSO and move on to the next contact. Point #2 is
is simply a reflection of my personal belief that time wasted worrying
about things for which I have no ability to significantly influence is
wasted time - and the clock is ticking for all of us.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com
On 18-Jan-18 7:46 PM, Dave Heil wrote:
So this is sort of like Olympic doping or other amateur endeavors
where they keep score?
Dave Heil K8MN
On 18-Jan-18 05:38, Jeff Blaine wrote:
There is no real point of worrying about what the other guy is
using. We only can control our personal operation, and really have
to leave the other end of the Q to manage theirs.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|