Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna

To: gregg.w6izt1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna
From: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:39:49 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I have the jk version, was using it as a ewe, which worked ok, recently 
converted it to a bog, about 200 ft long, easy to build, seems to work , worked 
a bunch this weekend which I could not hear on my inv l.....understand the 
signals are puny, but the noise is non existent.....

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 26, 2018, at 10:48 AM, <gregg.w6izt1@gmail.com> 
> <gregg.w6izt1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Pete:
> 
> I'm using RG6 for my beverages. They are switched, bidirectional.
> Performance seems to be equivalent to a single wire beverage. They can also
> be deployed as a BOG. RG6 is cheap, and I built my own transformers and
> switches. If you suspect a problem, they can be checked out with an ohm
> meter. Not sure why these have not caught on as folks continue to struggle
> with ladderline and WD1. JK Antenna offers a commercial version as well.
> 
> 73
> Gregg
> W6IZT
> 
> -----Original Message----, and-
> From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of
> donovanf@starpower.net
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:47 PM
> To: topband reflector <Topband@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna
> 
> Hi Pete, 
> 
> 
> The bad news is that 215 feet is not long enough to produce good performance
> from a Beverage. It will work for a BOG, but that's not your best choice. 
> 
> 
> Could you install two or three short verticals over a total length of
> 120 feet? The YCCC three element array is a superb choice if you can. The
> Hi-Z arrays are also worthy of consideration. 
> 
> 
> https://static.dxengineering.com/global/images/instructions/dxe-yccc-3inline
> .pdf 
> 
> 
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "N4ZR" <n4zr@comcast.net>
> To: "topband reflector" <Topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 3:40:07 PM
> Subject: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna 
> 
> I've just spent a very educational hour with Google Earth looking at my
> Beverage options for 160M. On a 45/225 azimuth I can only get about 215
> feet. Is that even worth doing with a conventional Beverage? What about a
> BOG? Because of my lot layout I will need to use a reversible 2-wire
> Beverage with the NE end right outside my shack. Don't know if the KD9SV
> reversing transformers will work for a BOG. 
> 
> My other reasonable receiving option is a K9AY loop or similar. 
> Transmitting antenna will be an inverted L, with vertical section probably
> no more than 60 feet. I'd like to finish my 160M DXCC this winter if
> possible 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide. 
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster. 
> 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 
> 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> 
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>