Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m
From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:59:47 -0300
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hello

This data is not representative of mode´s use

people not use to spot FT8, why to do that?

Is just one frequency, no need to S&P


73,
Jorge



<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

El sáb., 3 ago. 2019 a las 12:34, W0MU Mike Fatchett (<w0mu@w0mu.com>)
escribió:

> Of the last 1000 spots downloaded from DX Summit  just over 200 of them
> at on FT8.  Which means that nearly 800 spots were NOT FT8 meaning those
> were CW or SSB spots.  Not all of the spots are actually spots as many
> spots are just people venting and using the system as their message system.
>
> Are we really not utilizing our bands?
>
> You decide.
>
> W0MU
>
>
>
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>


-- 
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>