Of course Lee is absolutely correct.
Many 160 DXers who have had difficulty with receiving antennas
have given up too easily during the troubleshooting process.
73
Frank
W3LPL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee STRAHAN" <k7tjr@msn.com>
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 5:40:11 PM
Subject: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year
Hmmm, Nick,
I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries, zones worked
but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas.
In my opinion your statement is dead wrong.
Not looking for a war of words or any more discussion. I will not respond again
about this.
Lee K7TJR
Hi-Z Antennas
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces+k7tjr=msn.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of uy0zg
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 7:10 AM
To: peter.voelpel@t-online.de
Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
<topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
Dr Peter
Super RX antennas for 160 m do not exist!
Exist :
- good conditions
- Quiet countryside
- Geography
Does not exist :
- Miracles
____________________________
I never envy. They envy me!
In CQ WW I only heard three from the USA - K7GM, W1KM, W3UA.
These are honest QSOs.
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
dj7ww@t-online.de писал 2020-12-01 16:38:
> It´s amazing, the probably envious stations always suspect others with
> their better antennas and perhaps better operation to use web sdr.
>
> 73
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband
> [mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com]
> On
> Behalf Of uy0zg
> Sent: Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2020 14:19
> To: Tom | SP5XO
> Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
>
> Hi
>
> Weeks conditions ?
>
> For the best of the ex USSR countries, this is not a problem!
>
>
> Very good HIGH + WEB SDR+ very kind and democratic American judges =
>
>
> super result is ready!
>
> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020-11/msg08693.html
>
>
> .........
>
> 73 !
>
> ---
> Nick, UY0ZG
> http://www.topband.in.ua
>
> Tom | SP5XO ????? 2020-12-01 14:21:
>> Compare to recent weeks conditions were marginal during CQWW. Only
>> two Zone
>> 4 stations were audible here and it took long time to work them.
>> Whereas a
>> week ago band was wide open from MI, IL to CO or even down to TX.
>> I worked only mults and Dx's this time. Only 13 stations from Zone 5
>> in my log. Except for VY2ZM all NA's were weak including KC1XX and
>> W3LPL!
>> Hopeful things improve for next weekend and will work some more in
>> ARRL 160.
>> CU
>> Tom
>> sp5xo
>>
>> Conditions certainly didn't favor 160 over the weekend CQWW contest
>> here in
>>> Florida at least.
>>>
>>> Looking back in 2019 I worked 50 countries on 160 during CQWW, this
>>> year it was only 17, only 3 Europeans and those were very weak. I'm
>>> sure the lack of expeditions due to CV-19 played a part but on whole
>>> I think many guys in hindsight will be glad they didn't spend the
>>> money to go.
>>>
>>> Maybe things will pick up next weekend for the ARRL 160 test though
>>> that tends to be largely a USA to USA test and it is hard to hear
>>> the DX through the local mob
>>>
>>> CU guys in the pile up
>>>
>>> Dave
>>> NR1DX
>>> --
>>> Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
>> Reflector
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|