| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Using Rohn 65? |
| From: | K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com) |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Aug 1996 17:20:33 -0400 |
I suspect that a tower ordinance defining amateur use as being based upon the brand name , type, or strength of the tower erected will not stand up to legal challenge... It would seem to me that a simple (and defensible) ordinance, would specify a maximum height and that the owner be a licensed amateur and that the tower be restricted to transmit useage only in the amateur service... Don't make the simple, complex... Denny |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | crank up tower loads, Nick England |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | crank up tower loads, <subich@ibm.net (Joe Subich) |
| Previous by Thread: | Using Rohn 65?, Dick Bodine |
| Next by Thread: | Using Rohn 65?, Robert E. Naumann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |