---------- Forwarded Message ----------
From: INTERNET:n3hrt@eagle1.eaglenet.com,
INTERNET:n3hrt@eagle1.eaglenet.com
TO: Tower-talk, INTERNET:towertalk@contesting.com
DATE: 01/08/97 10:05
RE: [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical
Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Received: from dayton.akorn.net (dayton.akorn.net [205.217.100.11])
by arl-img-3.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.2) with ESMTP id
KAA05841;
Fri, 1 Aug 1997 10:05:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dayton.akorn.net (majordom@dayton.akorn.net
[205.217.100.11])
by dayton.akorn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA23145;
Fri, 1 Aug 1997 10:05:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by dayton.akorn.net (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09
00:29:32)); Fri, 01 Aug 1997 10:05:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eagle1.eaglenet.com (eagle1.eaglenet.com [198.77.74.2])
by dayton.akorn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA23114
for <towertalk@contesting.com>; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 10:05:19 -0400
(EDT)
>Martin, n3hrt writes:
>I have about $300.00 to spend and I want to buy an
antenna that will cover 40-10 meters..So, after looking thru all of my
catalogs, I decided that one of the Gap verticals might be a
good choice...So, after making that decision, I starting asking around
about them,
trying to find someone who actually had one to see how they perform,
Everyone I talked to either hates them or loves them..(none of these
poeple have actually owned one)...Any comments, suggestions, or alternative
ideas would be greatly
appreciated.
Martin, I have used a GAP Voyager (160-20) for a couple of years and have
exchanged experiences with other GAP users . I'll summarize the consensus
on the GAPs covering 160-up and 80-up (haven't talked with someone using
the 40-up): they work fairly well (I get a lot of compliments and have had
moderate success in running and pouncing) on all bands EXCEPT the lowest
ones each covers. A number of people including me have been disappointed
with what appears to be low efficiency on the lowest band. I've raised the
counterpoise a bit and added a coax choke and ground system to try to
improve the 160-meter performance; 80 seems better but 160 still nothing to
write home about. On the other hand, although I'm moving to Comtek/Force
12 4-squares on 160 and 80, I intend to keep the GAP (well away from the
others) as an omnidirectional spotter and backup.
73 es GL, Jim VE1JF/W8JF
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|