Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles
From: wb6vgi@erols.com (Larry Minnis)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:27:39 -0500
"Dick Green". wrote:
> 
> That was easy. Now, how can you broadband a low (say, 60 feet up) 80M dipole
> or vee enough to cover 3500-3900? Is the "coaxial resonator match" the only
> route?
> 
> 73, Dick, WC1M
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. B. Cebik . <cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu>
> To: Lee.Buller. <k0wa@southwind.net>
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, December 10, 1997 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Simple Dipoles
> 
> >Lee:
> >
> >Re: 40 meter dipoles 50' up
> >
> >Your problem is essentially the same one brought up recently by Dave
> >Leeson.  The feedpoint impedance of a dipole for 40 meters at that height
> >is somewhere in the 70-90 ohm region at resonance.  Hence, a narrow 2:1
> >SWR bandwidth.
> >
> >Solution #1:  place a 1/4 wl section of 75-ohm cable from the antenna
> >feedpoint to the junction with the 50-ohm cable.
> >
> >Solution #2:  if the bandwidth still does not cover 40 meters completely,
> >place a 1/2 wl length of 50-ohm cable from the antenna to a point in mid
> >air.  Then add the 1.4 wl 75-ohm cable section.  Then continue the 50-ohm
> >cable run to the shack.  This second system broadens the operating
> >bandwidth even further.
> >
> >The latter system is Dave's idea based on ideas from Frank Witt and
> >others.
> >
> >Hope this is useful.
> >
> >-73-
> >
> >LB, W4RNL
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> >Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> >Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> >Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
Robert C. Wilson, published an 2 page article in QST called the "Fat
Dipole". His design goal was less than 2:1 SWR from 3.5 to 4.0MHZ with a
nominal height of 30 Ft. I've tried his design and it works. Sorry but I
dont have the date of the issue with this article. Larry WB6VGI/KG4ML



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>