Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

FW: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: FW: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
From: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com (Scandurra,Anthony)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:17:59 -0500

Anthony Scandurra
UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems
Phone: (302)434-7655
Fax: (302)594-4020
Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scandurra,Anthony 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 1998 10:10 AM
> To:   'Roger L. Elowitz'
> Subject:      RE: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
> 
> Looks like someone has decided to "spoof" me. For the record, as I
> said before, I enjoyed the article and encourage those with friends
> considering joining our hobby to read this article. It is most
> favorable.
> 
> Roger, I received your private email thanking me for my comments on
> the article. You are welcome.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Anthony Scandurra
> UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems
> Phone: (302)434-7655
> Fax: (302)594-4020
> Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger L. Elowitz [SMTP:K2JAS@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 1998 7:33 PM
> To:   Scandurra,Anthony
> Subject:      RE: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
> 
> Hey, 
> It's something to read.  You got something better? 
> 
> At 02:09 PM 3/9/98 -0700, you wrote: 
> >>>>  
>       more qrm...shit 
> 
>       You're right, Roger. It's a great article. So good, in fact,
> that I am 
>       probably going to send the link to a few friends who are "on the
> fence" 
>       about getting their ticket. 
> 
>       Anthony Scandurra - KG2MY 
>       UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems 
>       Phone: (302)434-7655 
>       Fax: (302)594-4020 
>       Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com 
> 
>       > -----Original Message----- 
>       > From: Roger L. Elowitz [SMTP:K2JAS@worldnet.att.net] 
>       > Sent: Monday, March 09, 1998 3:49 PM 
>       > To:   towertalk@contesting.com 
>       > Subject:      [TowerTalk] New York Times Article 
>       >  
>       > Hi Gang, 
>       >  
>       > We've recently read in this esteemed forum posts decrying the
> New  York 
>       > Times article that contained several inaccuracies. What
> appears to be 
>       > missed is that in spite of these glaring errors (glaring to us
> at 
>       > least) 
>       > the article is a much needed bit of positive publicity.  
>       >  
>       > You are invited to read the article on-line for yourselves and
> make  up 
>       > your 
>       > own minds as to it's merits.... always a good thing. Go
> to...... 
>       >  
>       >
> http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/03/circuits/articles/05ham-radi
> 
>       > o.html 
>       >  
>       > It's an interesting read and I highly recommend it to you. 
>       >  
>       > Roger, K2JAS/4 
>       >  
>       > -- 
>       > FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html 
>       > Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com 
>       > Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com 
>       > Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com 
>       > Search:
> http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search 
> 
>       -- 
>       FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html 
>       Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com 
>       Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com 
>       Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com 
>       Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <<<< 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>