Jeff, Ed, and i'm sure others, If you don't like it, then i'm sorry, but
the matter of proper subjects was addressed by Steve and Bill and the
messages still keep coming through.
I think that I did act gentlemanly. What exactly do you consider vulgar and
belligerent? Because I posted what I felt? Because i've seen 5 more of
these messages since the announcement was made not to? Get real.
Your form of intelligent discourse is to try and discredit/defame me by
posting this to the reflector?
Your reply gets the big thunk too. Right in the trash can. Where it belongs.
End of thread.
Period.
At 06:22 PM 7/21/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Ed:
>
>With all due respect, I think that Scott is the one who should behave in a
>gentlemanly manner, as the rest of us do. Personally, I found Scott's
>remarks to be far too aggressive, belligerent, vulgar, downright
>ungentlemanly and completely inappropriate in a forum comprised of comrades,
>his opinion notwithstanding. What makes him think we all want to read *his*
>crass off-topic and repugnant remarks? The matter had already been addressed
>by Steve. Period.
>
>Surely we deserve more intelligent discourse from a fellow Towertalkian.
>
>73,
>
>Jeff Singer K2KV
>
>
>-------------
>Ed wrote:
>
>Guys, Scott is right. His relative inexperience as a ham, plus the
>advantages he will gain are such that for him, matters more directly
>related to the TT purpose can only serve to help him.
>
>Obviously, considering his remarks about his "undies", he is very
>sensitive concerning this matter.
>
>Return flames would therefore not be appropriate. Let's show that we
>are gentlemen and can act as such when confronted with messages such
>as his.
>
>73
>
>Ed
>
>--
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]On Behalf Of K4SB
>Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 3:09 PM
>To: Scott Bullock
>Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] towertalk subjects
>
>
>
>Scott Bullock wrote:
>
>I don't appreciate others posting this licensing crap onto the
>reflector either, like k5rc, I too get 80+ e-mail a day without seeing
>this stuff.
>
>Maybe what needs to be done to make these people listen is to have them
>automatically banned from the reflector for posting this stuff. Maybe
>that will smarten them up a little bit and make them understand that
>others are more interested in TOWERS and appropriate subjects than
>their replies and views of what they think ham licenses should be.
>
>Flame away, i've got triple lined kevlarbestos undies, but do it
>privately, so I can be sure to put your replies in the trash
>box......where they belong.
>
>Now let's get on to helping others with their tower projects.
>
>Scott
>KA1CLX
>
>
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|