Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: [TowerTalk] 160 inverted "L"

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Fw: [TowerTalk] 160 inverted "L"
From: gussam@newcomm.net (Gus VO1MP)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 23:30:51 -0230


----------
> From: Gus VO1MP <gussam@newcomm.net>
> To: w7why@mail.coos.or.us; Lee Buller <k0wa@southwind.net>
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverted "L"
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 11:27 PM
> 
> Tom:
> 
> about 14/15 years ago CQ ? Magazine or QST ? featured 
> an  article about an inverted L with a folded horizontal portion .
> the horizontal portion used 6 inch spacing bars positioned 
> about every 4 feet .
> So the antenna had a 60 foot or less vertical portion and then 
> a 35 foot horizontal section doubled back towards the tower with 
> spacers as above.
> I actually used this antenna on a 110 X 50 ft city lot with my House in the
> middle , the spacers were made from ordinary wooden rods cut to 8 " lengths
> then boiled in linseed oil as a preservative. I  drilled two holes in each 
> spacer 6 inches
> apart and wrapped the wires that were inserted with nylon string to keep them 
> from twisting
> around.
> Put as many radials as I could under the thing, considering the space 
> limitations
> they were every conceivable length.
> Worked 100 countries on it before I took it down.  From Here VK -  ZL - VU2
> that's about as far as it gets on top band.
> Try it  !!
> BTW  the vertical portion of mine was only 48 feet high !!
> 
>   73 GL Gus
> ----------
> > From: Lee Buller <k0wa@southwind.net>
> > To: w7why@mail.coos.or.us
> > Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverted "L"
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 6:54 PM
> > 
> > 
> > At 09:06 PM 9/15/98 -0700, you wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi fellow TT'ians
> > >
> > >I want to make a linear loaded inverted L for 160.  The vertical part
> > >would be 65 feet long, and the linear loaded part would be 30 feet.  I
> > >want to hook one side of the stub to the top of the vertical wire, and
> > >then short the other end of the stub.  Would 300 ohm ribbon be too
> > >narrow for the stub, or would I have to make some kind of open wire stub
> > >for the linear loaded portion.  Thanks and 73
> > >Tom W7WHY
> > 
> > Tom....
> > 
> > You need about 130 feet to make a good inverted L.  Oh, you can place a
> > coil in the horizontal leg and get by with that....or you can use a series
> > capacitor at the bottom to tune it.  But, I do not use a stub in the sense
> > that I understand you to mean.  At 130 feet you can almost feed it direct
> > because it is a quarter wave at 160 meters....and of course a half wave at
> > 80 meters.  I have one that is 55 verticle and 75 feet horizontal.  Works
> > FB with a bunch of radials underneath the verticle part.  I have around 10
> > random length radials...cause that is what I can get onto the lot.
> > 
> > See the Handbook for more disucssion, but they are a very simple antenna.
> > 
> > Lee
> > k0wa@southwind.net
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> > Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> > Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> > 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>