Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ?
From: Rick.Wells@digital.com (Rick Wells)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:17:41 -0400
Another comment in favor of Rohn 45G, it is *very* comfortable to climb,
i.e., stand on.  Can even get two people on opposite sides of the tower at
the same height with an inch to spare.  I really enjoy working on my 45G.
(I wear size 9 shoes.)


-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Shoaf [mailto:dshoaf@Mondobaking.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 1999 11:51 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ?



I am in the planning process of putting up a 130' tower in NE Alabama.  I
will put up a M2 3 ele 40 mtr yagi atop.  I want to put up Rohn 45, but my
budget may not allow it (only 3k in budget).  Can I safely put that type of
Ant. @ 130' with Rohn 25, if I follow all of Rohn guying specs and not do
any potential damage to the tower or worse.  Any and all advice/suggestion
are highly appreciated.

One strange question.  Does Rohn make a 45/25 Reducer ?  Where as if I
wanted to go up 70 ft with Rohn 45, then rest of the way with 25 ?  May
seem strange or may not serve any other purpose other than saving
money......Agn, any opinions are appreciated......

Dennis, W4DWS



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>