Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] MFJ 259 and the like - Accuracy?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] MFJ 259 and the like - Accuracy?
From: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:42:38 -0600
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 11:14:45 EDT, K7LXC@aol.com wrote:

> But use of our ham antenna analyzers works acceptably in 90% of 
> applications.

And one important factor that hasn't been mentioned is the analyzer puts
out such a weak signal that it interferes with no one unless you have
close ham neighbors.

Just think.  Can you imagine having a 259 back in the 60s! Wow.  As far
as i'm concerned, it is the best piece of test gear for hams in MANY
decades, not just a couple.

Do you remember the strip of twin lead with dual light bulbs?  I do.

Gary
-- 
Please notify your ISP if you don't receive this.

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>