To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Towertalk] Anyone have Trylon Titan self supporting? Curious as to qual... |
From: | k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK) |
Date: | Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:24:40 -0400 |
> The AN towers cost more because they WEIGH more. I saw an > AN tower in person at Dayton and IMO it's WAY overkill for most ham > installations. If you want to hang a couple of big microwave dishes > on it or maybe a 75M beam - it's perfect. On the other hand, the AN tower has sufficient capacity to be useful in high windload areas (like Florida, coastal Carolinas, etc.). Even the heaviest Trylon towers are not spec'd for a big tribander (C31XR, etc.) in 100 or 110 MPH zones unless you only want 40 or 50 feet. 73, ... Joe, K4IK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Non-Resonant Guy lengths, Mike Gilmer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Towertalk] 'Toes' of a tower concrete base, Mark |
Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] NY State antenna legislation, Mike Gilmer |
Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] Anyone have Trylon Titan self supporting? Curious as to qual..., K7LXC@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |