I hope WZ7I doesn't mind my public response to his
question about the differences between the XM240 and
402CD. Thought this may be of interest to others as well.
The XM240 is considerably more robust than the 402CD.
It has a 2.5 inch boom vs 2.0 for the early model,
double and triple wall elements close to the boom
vs. single wall on the original, and MUCH better
mounting hardware for the elements and boom.
Some people note more interaction with tribanders
with the XM240 which has insulated elements. The
simple solution would be to run a jumber between the
center of the reflector and the boom.
The loading coil is still there and it is still worthwhile to
change the screws to SS with lock nuts or double nuts.
Tom N4KG
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 09:21:19 -0400 Wes Cosand <wz7i@arrl.net> writes:
> At 22:02 10/11/02 , you wrote:
> >Hmmmm....
> >
> >My guess is the 2L40 at 70 to 100 ft will put out more signal
> >than a 4 Square. If fast direction change is important to you,
> >the 4 SQR has the advantage in that area.
> >
> >Tom N4KG (very happy with my 402CD at 95 ft)
>
> Tom:
>
> Are there substantive differences between the 402CD and the current
> XM240. Where has this coil gone that everyone talks about?
>
> Wes, WZ7I
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
|