To: | Bob Gates <regates@kingwoodcable.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower wind loads |
From: | "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com> |
Reply-to: | k4oj@tampabay.rr.com |
Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:29:30 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I bet that it is somewhere between 10 and 30 square foot! My guess is that it would favor the lower number as it seems these things get worser faster with stronger forces (must be a geometric progression of some kind...) Guess from a non-engineer: 17 sf Okay P.E.'s, how close a guess did I make? 73, Jim, K4OJ Bob Gates wrote: Sorry for the elementary question, but my knowledge of civil engineering went right out of my brain the day I left my last class approximately two life times ago. If you have a tower rated to hold 30sf of antenna at 70 mph, and 10sf at 90mph, what correlation, if any, can you draw about the load handling ability at 80mph. Is there a linear relationship, or does it require a whole new set of calcs? Thanks in advance, _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80M attic loop, Mike Rhodes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80M attic loop, mcduffie |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower wind loads, Bud Hippisley, K2KIR |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower wind loads, Bob Gates |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |