Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TowerTalk] Verticals or low dipoles in the city

To: "Ve6wz_Steve" <ve6wz@shaw.ca>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Verticals or low dipoles in the city
From: "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:26:19 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> In an urban setting (city), the surrounding ground clutter could make
> vertical performance questionable. As far as the eye can see, the VE6WZ
> 73, de steve VE6WZ.  http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz/index.html

On my city lot in Silicon Valley, I compared an
80 meter dipole at 55 feet to a quarter wave
vertical with 2 elevated radials.  On DX, I
couldn't tell the difference.  For working up
and down the west coast, the dipole was much
better.

Rick N6RK
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>