To: | David Robbins K1TTT <k1ttt@arrl.net>, Towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [TowerTalk] static cat |
From: | Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com> |
Date: | Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:59:47 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I am puzzled about the phrase "under threat of lawsuits." Who was
threatening, who were they threatening, and what was the substance of the
threats? You left us hanging. Bill At 02:49 PM 3/21/2004 +0000, you wrote: There are peer reviewed analysis of the claims and effectiveness of those 'brush' or 'porcupine' devices. They have been shown to not work as described. They may make a decent lightning rod as the sharp points can generate nice streamers to connect to the downward traveling lightning leader... thus the signs of 'high voltage activity'. but they can not dissipate the charge buildup nor create an effective shield over a structure to prevent lightning. Bill Aycock - W4BSG Woodville, Alabama _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] static cat, mcduffie |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Lightning protection, K3BU |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] static cat, David Robbins K1TTT |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] static cat, Tony King - W4ZT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |