| Hi Arlis,
That would work, but he wants to use two bands at one time.
It would wind up being pretty complex, but workable.
73, Tom W8JI
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "w7xu" <w7xu@iw.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 4-square inside a 160 4-square?
Pros andConsplease!
> At the risk of making a foolish suggestion, why couldn't
you build
> a 4-square made up of conical monopoles, wherein each
antenna would
> cover both 160 and 80?  The antennas would be spaced
1/4-wavelength
> on 80 and 1/8-wavelength on 160.  Then switch in/out
separate phasing
> lines for the 2 bands.
>
> 73 and awaiting replies from the educated,
>
> Arliss  W7XU
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting
Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call
Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for
Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
 |