Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Ground system design, RF vs AC

To: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ground system design, RF vs AC
From: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Reply-to: garyschafer@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:09:18 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The whole idea behind the SPG is to have only one ground that the radio 
equipment sees. It has nothing to do with how other grounds are or are 
not tied together.
However it is always a good idea to tie all grounds together. The 
National Electric Code thinks so.

73
Gary  K4FMX


ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca wrote:
> I'm a little confused by Martin's question.
> 
> I thought the whole idea behind an SPG was to not only 
> MAKE SURE the two grounds were connected, but to 
> eliminate the distinction.
> 
> Have I missed something?
> 
> 73, kelly
> ve4xt
>  
> 
>>From: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
>>Date: 2005/02/25 Fri PM 03:39:09 CST
>>To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ground system design, RF 
> 
> vs AC
> 
>>>If you cross-connect your ham & AC power grounds, 
>>
> any such fault currents
> 
>>will flow in your ground system too, for better or 
> 
> worse.
> 
>>AFAIK, every piece of ham gear that uses a three 
> 
> prong AC cord has the
> 
>>safety (green) wire securely attached to the chassis.  
> 
> If you attach a
> 
>>ground strip from the chassis to the ham system 
> 
> ground, does this meet your
> 
>>definition of "cross connect"?
>>
>>Keith NM5G
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
>>[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On 
> 
> Behalf Of Martin AA6E
> 
>>Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:11 PM
>>To: keith@dutson.net; towertalk@contesting.com
>>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ground system design, RF 
> 
> vs AC
> 
>>Keith,
>>
>>I believe "fault" is the general electrical term for power 
> 
> going where it
> 
>>shouldn't.  That's why we have protective system 
> 
> grounds in AC systems.  If
> 
>>there is a short circuit in an appliance connecting the 
> 
> hot side to the
> 
>>chassis, a fault current flows in the ground lead and 
> 
> the user is protected.
> 
>>A GFCI detects even tiny fault currents and shuts off 
> 
> the circuit asap.
> 
>>(It detects a difference between hot & neutral current, 
> 
> as you
> 
>>suggest.)  That's a good thing, but old-fashioned fault 
> 
> protection involves
> 
>>blowing the upstream fuse or breaker with an 
> 
> overload current.
> 
>> That's one reason why your branch circuit wiring has 
> 
> to be matched to your
> 
>>breaker - to be sure it will trip quickly if there is a 
> 
> short.
> 
>>If you cross-connect your ham & AC power grounds, 
> 
> any such fault currents
> 
>>will flow in your ground system too, for better or 
> 
> worse.
> 
>>-Martin (who is not an electrician)
>>
>>--- Keith Dutson <kjdutson@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You wrote:
>>>
>>>>The problem with connecting the AC green wire to 
>>>
> the radio room
> 
>>>ground and
>>>then connecting my bulkhead "SPG" to a new 
>>
> ground rod or even a 
> 
>>>perimeter ground connection is that my radio 
>>
> installation becomes part 
> 
>>>of the AC protective ground system for the house.  
>>
> That is, any house 
> 
>>>fault or other current will partly be routed through my 
>>
> radio ground 
> 
>>>system. Is that what we want?
>>>
>>>When you say "house fault" I assume you are 
>>
> referencing a ground  
> 
>>>fault  circuit interrupter (GFCI) system.  Such a 
>>
> system interacts with 
> 
>>>the  white  neutral ground, not the green safety 
>>
> ground.  So the answer 
> 
>>>is yes,  we do  want the safety ground connected.
>>>...
>>
> ___________________________________________
> ____
> 
>>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self 
> 
> Supporting Towers", "Wireless
> 
>>Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 
> 
> 1-800-333-9041 with any
> 
>>questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>>
>>
> 
> ___________________________________________
> ____
> 
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> 
> ___________________________________________
> ____
> 
>>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self 
> 
> Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and 
> lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
>>
> ___________________________________________
> ____
> 
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 



_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>