At 02:27 PM 3/18/2005, Ken Kinyon wrote:
>Ok,
>I understand. you have a financial interest in an alternative school of
>thought.
>Regards,
>ken
>
>-
I suspect that the FAA, NASA, etc. who did the referenced study don't have
a vested interest in manufacturing (or not) of lightning
preventors. Neither do the authors of the Mousa paper in the IEEE
Transactions, nor the peer reviewers. The manufacturers of the devices, on
the other hand, do.
If you want atmospheric scientists, the paper by Uman and Rakov in BAMS
(Dec 2002) should do you. The paper from Moore at the Langmuir Lab is
another good one.
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|