Jim:
Those of us who live in Texas always worry when the Texas Legislature is
in session as we never know what some of those clowns in Austin might
approve. Every so often the legislature has to come back in a costly
special session right after the regular session ends to undo or clarify
some of the junk they approved in the closing days of the regular
session. It seems a lot of them in Austin don't often read the stuff
they are voting on.
Also, many years ago a television station caught several state
representatives casting votes for their fellow absent reps, in addition
to their own, whose desk was next to theirs. At one time the House of
Representatives in Austin had an antiquated key system to cast record
votes. It required a key to vote and most reps. just left their key in
the lock controlling their desk voting device all the time. So a rep.
sitting next to them would just reach over and vote yea or nea.
I've been in the House of Representatives several times in Austin when
the legislature was not in session and most, if not all of their keys
were in the voting lock in each desk.
The TV station caught one rep. reaching all around his desk casting votes.
Its kind of like what they do in Washington when a rep ask for
permission to "revise and extend my remarks". They insert all this
stuff in the Congressional Record that they never even said on the floor
of the House.
Tom, WW5L
Jim Jarvis wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I sent a note to Sudeep Reddy, the reporter who covered
> the TX State Senate committee vote, allowing a BPL bill
> to come to the state senate floor.
>
> His reportage was straight-factual stuff. They spun, and
> he dutifully recorded.
>
> In my note, I attempted to alert him to factual areas which
> would require some reportorial enterprise in future. I would
> discourage our community from bombarding the reporter with
> notes slamming BPL.
>
> Of note in the story, though:
>
> A legislator or industry guy estimated $300-500M as investment
> required to provide 70-80% coverage. The argument supporting BPL
> is usually the last 5% or so, who are not served by cable.
>
> If 80% coverage will cost $500M, then I would guestimate the
> remaining 20% will cost something close to $2.0B. Certainly
> well north of a Billion. And, of course, nobody would pay
> the resulting rates.
>
> "The Socialized Power Grid" is a charming expression. Fertile,
> in so many ways. None more fertile than the immediate area around
> the TX state legislature, however.
>
> Be careful where you step, down there in Tejas!
>
> N2EA
> jimjarvis@ieee.org
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
> Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|