Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ??

To: "'Al Williams'" <alwilliams@olywa.net>,<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ??
From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:21:02 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would not do it.  I would use 213 or 9913F7.

73, Keith NM5G

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Williams [mailto:alwilliams@olywa.net] 
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Keith Dutson; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ??


>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
>Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:40 AM


>I have found the "comfortable" bending radius is about 1.5 feet (3 foot
> loop), but you could get a loop quite a bit tighter without distorting the
> center conductor.  I treat it similar to 1/2 inch hardline.
>
Can standard LMR400 be used for the rotator to tower loop which has repeated

bending or should flexible LMR400 be used?

k7puc 

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>