Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected.

To: "'Tom Rauch'" <w8ji@contesting.com>,"'Dale L Martin'" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected.
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:26:16 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom Rauch
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 9:15 AM
> To: Dale L Martin; towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole resonates lower than expected.
> 
> > All the responses have addressed the effects of insulation
> on the
> > wire, Bob.  But, no one has commented on what the analyzer
> result was
> > in a 75 ohm system.  Does your analyzer evaluate 75 ohm
> systems or
> > 52/50 ohm systems?
> 
> That doesn't matter Dale. He is reading R and X on the
> analyzer, not SWR.
> 
> What you say about tuning the combined system does matter.
> 
> If the feedline has standing waves the only time an analyzer
> inside the house will directly indicate actual antenna
> resonance  is when the feedline is an exact multiple of 1/4
> wl long. If the feeder is not an exact multiple of 1/4 wl
> and has standing waves, it will cause the X=0 point to shift
> frequency from the value at the antenna.
> 
> I'd bet not many people consider that fact when setting
> resonance.
> 
> 73 Tom
> 

Wouldn't that be exact 1/2 wavelength of feed line or multiples, and not 1/4
wavelength.

73
Gary  K4FMX


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>