Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Ham IV Rotor

To: "Tim G. Boerresen" <tim@sunsite.lv>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ham IV Rotor
From: "Brad Pioveson" <w9fx@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Brad Pioveson <w9fx@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:00:02 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Tim, in the old Ham II rotor manual, CDE stated the following:

"With 98 ball bearings operating in accurately machined races, the rotor is 
capable of handling as much as a thousand pounds of downward pressure in 
line with the axis of rotation."  This rating refers to balanced weight, 
and, the importance of keeping the weight ". . .in line with the axis of 
rotation. . ." cannot be understated.  The Ham IV's castings (upper and 
lower) have been beefed up a bit since that was written about the Ham II 
series, so, I'd think that this rating is still applicable, if a bit on the 
conservative side.

Additionally, the same manual strongly discusses the benefits of mounting 
the rotor on a flat plate (vs mast mounting), and, stresses the use of a 
thrust bearing.  Failure to do so seriously derates the rotor's ability to 
do it's job (and, survive).

Hope this helps.

73, Brad, W9FX
www.fxrotorworks.com

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>