Pete:
You are probably correct: Using your 75 Ohm coax hunk at other than
28.000 and 28.875 (representing 32 and 33 half-wavelengths, respectively, of
your fundamental freq of 1.750 MHz) is putting your measurement into the whacky
world of transmission line mismatches and the Smith Chart. That is, your
measurement technique is valid ONLY at 28.000 and 28.750 MHz (exact
half-wavelength multiples.) Away from these freqs and you see the complex
impedance of your far-end coax cable PLUS whatever the length of 75 Ohm cable
looks like.
This error exists on lower freqs, too, as you probably know. But the
freqs at which the errors would be reproduced are outside the Ham bands - not
of much interest to you, I suppose.
73 de
Gene Smar AD3F
> I have just been trying to get a baseline loss measurement on my two
> feedlines
> from shack to tower, using the MFJ-259B in Coax loss mode.
>
> According to the manual, the unit can be set to any frequency within its
> range,
> and will read out a direct return loss number at that frequency, if the coax
> is
> open at the other end.
>
> In practice, I find that around 28 MHz, for instance, the displayed loss
> value
> for one feedline can be anywhere from .9 to 2.1 dB, depending on the
> frequency.
> The displayed SWR on the unit is at a minimum when the loss figure is
> maximum,
> and vice versa.
>
> I think I may know why, if not how, this is happening. My feedlines both
> utilize long runs of 75-ohm CATV hardline, cut to a half-wave multiple at
> 1750
> KHz, and measured at 28 MHz. On either end of the 75-ohm runs are runs of
> 50-ohm RG-213 to the antennas and into the shack. My theory in doing things
> this way is that the 75-ohm will reflect the input impedance at the output,
> and
> as a practical matter it seems to work rather well. But my hunch is that
> particularly at 28 MHz, relatively small frequency excursions can result in
> the
> 75-ohm section translating to quite another impedance than the 50 ohms at the
> input end, and that this in turn results in the changing "loss" numbers.
>
> Do I have this right? If so, is any of the numbers I'm seeing an accurate
> reflection of the loss in the total composite feedline?
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> The World HF Contest Station Database
> was updated on 23 October 2005
> Over 3000 contest stations at
> www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
> Weather
> Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
> and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|