----Original Message Follows----
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
In some cases, one might not even need the phasing network. You could set
one antenna to present a inductive feedpoint impedance and the other to
have a capacitive reactance, and get your "phase shifter" for free.
Truly, adjustable element lengths in a 2D array (i.e. a stack) gives you a
whole raft of interesting possibilities that are alien to traditional
antenna schemes.
Jim wrote:
*The challenge will be in getting practical experience. Modeling it is
*simple enough, but with those "extra knobs to twist" it's not clear yet
*what will prove to be the most useful types of pattern.
Jim, W6RMK
That is exactly the problem for an average ham station with average ham
instruments. In tweaking a four 4 element SteppIR or even more complicated a
stack of four elements, how can you determine where you are and which
dimensions will give a desired effect? I've modeled a stack of 2 four
element SteppIR's best I could and then entered those dimensions into YO7
Optimizer to optimize, for example, gain. The results for me don't
necessarily follow my empirical results. It is difficult to know if I have
improved anything or just screwed it up. No big news but I have definitely
proven to myself that lowest SWR does not mean best gain. I have found that
on 20 meters both my four at 45 feet and my four at 85 feet do better than
both. Seems like a phasing problem but on the other bands results are as
expected.
Howard..K2HK
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|