| To: | "'Towertalk'" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 |
| From: | "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:27:38 +0200 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
My 100 foot mobile Versatower crankup MUST be guyed. I guess the additional downward force has been calculated for the size of wires and pulleys 73 Peter -----Original Message----- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom Osborne Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought guying a crankup tower was a no-no. Too much downward forces. Did I seee that somewhere? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60, Tom Osborne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60, Jim Lux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60, Tom Osborne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60, Jim Lux |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |