Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source

To: Cecil Moore <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source
From: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Reply-to: k3lr@k3lr.com
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:46:32 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have used the W2DU chokes and at 1500 watts they get way too warm. I suggest 
the W0IYH design. I use one at the output of
the amplifier and one at the feed point of every antenna. They work GREAT.

Comtek sells the W0IYH choke.

http://www.comteksystems.com

73!
Tim K3LR

Cecil Moore wrote:

> >From: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
> >Subject: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source
> >Howdy all...I am looking at constructing 2 W2DU bead baluns as described in
> >ARRL Antenna book that uses 12 Amidon FB-77-1024 beads.
>
> Not trying to change your mind, but you get more balun for the money with
> multi-turn
> toroids. Multi-turn toroids yield a choking impedance proportional to the
> square of the
> number of turns. Turns are cheap. W2DU baluns yield a choking impedance
> proportional
> to the number of beads. Beads are expensive. I have the very W2DU chokes
> that you
> want to build and don't use them.
> --
> 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series.  Who will win?
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://davevscarl.spaces.live.com/?icid=T001MSN38C07001
>
>   
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>