| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR |
| From: | "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 May 2007 23:51:12 +0200 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Those figures are EZNEC simulated 73 Peter -----Original Message----- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K7LXC@aol.com Currently Force 12 and SteppIR are the only manufacturers that use our protocol to produce useful comparable performance figures. If Optibeam figures were produced similarly, then I'd be more inclined to believe them. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] stepir vs c31xr - really Mosle, K7LXC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Plenty of Ham Friends who climb towers, J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR, K7LXC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR, Jim Lux |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |