To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Swinging Link Antenna Tuner Not Working |
From: | "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:24:09 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
The 1952 handbook has a real nice unit. Swinging link is old stuff and obsolete. Use a fixed link and a link capacitor to tune. I had one of those with the swinging link. used it to pivot the link out of the plug in coil so it could be pulled. coil was 8" x 4" by B&W HDVL, I think. john w9zy Chuck Pool <aa5wg@yahoo.com> wrote: Does anyone have pictures and component values for a swinging link antenna tuner that works well. My swinging link antenna tuner will not work. I tried feeding the open wire line in the series (current feed) and parallel (voltage feed) configuration but it would not work. Maybe my capacitor and coils are not the right values? The feed-line is 1/4 wavelength multiples. At present, I don' t want to use a series capacitor with the link coil. I use link coupling at the output tank circuit of two of my homebrew rigs. I use swinging link at the transmitter and fixed link at the antenna tuner, which is located at the base of the tower. At the transmitter I use a series variable cap, about 1100 pf in series with the link for 80 and 40. For 160 I had to use trial and error, and ended up with a network of fixed and variable capacitors to form a capacitive voltage divider to get it to take load. I adjust mine by swinging the link out to very loose coupling, and then adjusting the variable capacitor for maximum loading -- just a slight peak. That tells me the link is in resonance. Then I swing the link in for the proper degree of loading. Usually I have to re-dip the final when the link is swing in, but the re-adjustment should be very slight. At the antenna tuner I use a series cap for 80 and 40, but on 160 I hit just the right number of turns on the link that no series capacitor is needed. The xmtr and ant tuners are linked together with 50-ohm coax. It has been my experience that getting this system to work is a matter of trial and error. The number of turns on the link can make a big difference. In the past I have had to use a rotary inductor instead of variable capacitor to get the link to resonate. You can get much better coupling by resonating the link. With the correct number of turns the link will work non-resonant, that is, directly into a resistive load, but I have found the whole thing to be very unpredictable. But that's part of the fun of ham radio. Keep tinkering and modifying it until you get it to work, then configure it permanently. Don k4kyv _________________________________________________________________ Now you can see trouble?before he arrives http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_protection_0507 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] C3E vs EF-420S or EF-420, Dick Green WC1M |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ?, Don Moman VE6JY |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Swinging Link Antenna Tuner Not Working, Barrie Smith |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Rohn BAS25G wanted, Ron Tate |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |