To: | "Samir Popaja, 7S7V (SM7VZX)" <7s7v@adamomail.se>,<towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] W6NL 40-2CD => Moxon Conversion |
From: | "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net> |
Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2007 09:45:22 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Interesting stuff... I wonder how different the beam performance results would be for a similar configuration where the "Moxon" elements are replaced with a simple droppy wire. At the club station we have a 40m dipole made from 2" aluminum tubing. The horizonal element is 40ft, split in the center and fed directly with 52 ohm coax. At the ends of each of the 20ft pieces of tubing is #10 wire about 16ft long, but trimmed to resonance. Except for guy wire clearance or ethetics wouldn' t this configuration yield similar results as the "MOXON"? 73, dave wa3gin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Samir Popaja, 7S7V (SM7VZX)" <7s7v@adamomail.se> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 3:17 AM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] W6NL 40-2CD => Moxon Conversion This antenna appears to have been "built from the ground up" (2004 variant). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Pipe Cutters, Bill Turner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Pipe Cutters, Jeff Goldman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] W6NL 40-2CD => Moxon Conversion, Samir Popaja, 7S7V (SM7VZX) |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] W6NL 40-2CD => Moxon Conversion, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |