Actually, if I had limited space or, as in my case, only allowed to put up
one antenna(XYL), I would make a homebrew Hygain Hytower with at least 60
radials under it. The vertical will work on 20, 40, 75 without any hassles
and is loud for both DX and ragchewing. I have been using mine for 4 years
now and with just 1KW I can work anyone I can hear. Example: yesterday I
worked the Brunei station on 14.175 on the second call. He was 43 and I got
a 56 from him while most SE guys were getting 55. Go figure. BTW, I am
putting up a tower and yagi this summer and my HB Hytower will be for sale
FWIW.
Bob W6TR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
To: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>; "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Delta Loop compared to Dipole
(actualexperience)(Richards)
> Get the apex up as far as possible, feed it in one of the corners, put at
> least 5KW into it and you'll be loud everywhere.
>
> Bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>
> To: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Delta Loop compared to Dipole (actual
> experience)(Richards)
>
>
>> And what a fun conundrum. I am wrestling with some of the same questions
>> as
>> I plan my retirement QTH and antenna farm.
>>
>> I suggest there a couple of questions you need to ask and answer before
>> you
>> can make your decisions. The primary question is "What do you want to do
>> with your new antenna?" DX? Local ragchewing? Traffic nets? Domestic
>> contests? DX Contests? Or do you want a compromise antenna that will do
>> well enough across the board. Each choice of application will lead you
>> down a different path. The best 80 meter antenna for ragchewing with
>> other
>> USA hams is a very different antenna than the best antenna for 80 meter
>> DXing. Is your dream antenna directional or omni-directional? On and
>> on.
>>
>> Then there is the question "How good is good enough"? If your goal is
>> contesting is your goal to have a competitive station or just enough to
>> have
>> some fun? For 80 and 160 meters, have you considered the expense and
>> real-estate for receiving antennae?
>>
>> For me, my dream 160 and 80 meter antennas are a couple of 4-squares.
>> But,
>> for my uses, that solution is beyond good enough. I'd probably settle
>> for
>> a
>> pair of phased verticals to get me some gain and directivity at a price
>> that
>> I'm comfortable with and in the real estate I expect to have.
>>
>> Not to make this hard, but once you answer the "what do I want to be able
>> to
>> do" question, you will be in a good position to parse the wide range of
>> answers you got, make your decisions, and get your antennas up and on the
>> air.
>>
>> Good luck and 73... Bill K3WA
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
>> To: "Bill Stacy" <wstacy@wildblue.net>
>> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Delta Loop compared to Dipole (actual
>> experience)
>> (Richards)
>>
>>
>>> OK -- I will have to widen my research to include both the sky wire loop
>>> and the delta loop - and they are clearly different animals with
>>> different
>>> feeding and grazing behaviors.
>>>
>>> Great fun.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feed back.
>>>
>>> My Antenna Conundrum = I have been researching low band antennas,
>>> including towers, verticals, and wire antenna designs. My conundrum is
>>> there is no reliable source of information comparing the efficiency and
>>> effectiveness of the different antenna designs with each others. The
>>> reviews in QST say whether or not the antenna is a good one, but rarely
>>> compare it with the performance of anything other than the proverbial
>>> hypothetical dipole in free space. Looking on eHam.net is not
>>> particularly useful or reliable, as the typical ham typically recommends
>>> whatever he has used, and has limited experience in using several
>>> different types of antennas (like one recommending boxers or briefs
>>> depending on what HE likes to wear), and says he "can work whomever he
>>> hears" - but when no one can tell whether he is hearing all who might be
>>> heard on a better antenna...
>>>
>>> Some people suggest an inverted L design, others recommend a horizontal
>>> sky loop, others recommend a vertical Delta loop, still others suggest a
>>> 40 ft aluminum mono pole like what DX Engineering and Force-12 sell,
>>> while others say I need a HyGain Hy-Tower, and yet others suggest I put
>>> up a 50 or 60 foot tower, and hang long dipoles or loops off it, or
>>> suggest I load up the tower, itself, as a low band antenna. Some guys
>>> tell me to give up at my location. Thus, I don't know how to evaluate
>>> and compare all these different ideas in order to select what might work
>>> best at my location.
>>>
>>> And, I understand it is difficult to select a single design for all
>>> locations, and understand all the variables that arise in different
>>> locations -- which, of course, makes it all the more difficult. Also,
>>> there is a paucity of good antenna holding trees at my location, so I
>>> will must install some sort of mast or pole to sufficiently elevate any
>>> antenna off the ground. Otherwise, I may be compelled to install a 45
>>> foot aluminum pole, and tune it for the low bands - but, again, my
>>> original conundrum remains: how do I compare its efficiency with some
>>> other design, perhaps a sky or delta loop, which might perform better,
>>> perhaps for much less expense.
>>>
>>> I am fortunate in that I saved up for this over the past 30 years while
>>> working. So, money is not an object, other than I don't like spending
>>> more money that is necessary to accomplish the task, but I don't mind
>>> spending real money to get real results. I just don't know how to
>>> select from all the alternatives.
>>>
>>> To compound my conundrum, most hams I talk to locally, and even many
>>> store salesmen, tend to suggest some cheap, inexpensive shortcut
>>> solution that will, purportedly, save me a lot of money. But, again,
>>> I am looking for good results, not to just save money, and although I
>>> don't want to over spend money on a commercial solution if a home brew,
>>> inexpensive method works better, I am not averse to spending a penny to
>>> get it right. Yet, most advice is about how I can save a bunch of
>>> money - not on what might work best at my location.
>>>
>>> The more I research, the more overwhelmed I become. I need a reliable
>>> methodology for selecting among all the alternatives.
>>>
>>> Consequently, I have no idea what I I can install this summer and use
>>> this winter after the snow falls. But time is wasting away, and I
>>> worry I will not be find a solution in time to get it installed and
>>> operational.
>>>
>>> And I figure I cannot be the only guy facing this dilemma....
>>>
>>> What is a mother to do?
>>>
>>> Anyway, thanks for considering my plight. Any ideas are welcome on or
>>> off list. I do not wish to overstay my welcome. I know this reflector
>>> is about towers, but I fear if I install a big tower, it will hold a a
>>> beam for 20 m and up, and I will still have the same conundrum as to
>>> what to do on the low bands. What do guys with towers and small
>>> backyards do to play on the low bands?
>>>
>>> Thanks loads and happy trails to all.
>>>
>>> =================== Richards - K8JHR ====================
>>>
>>>
>>> /// Richards ///
>>> ===================================================
>>>
>>> Bill Stacy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The ARRL Antenna Book does NOT discuss delta loops. There is, however,
>>>> a
>>>> good discussion in ON4UN's Low Band DXing book.
>>>>
>>>> The delta is hard to beat for DX, especially when one considers its
>>>> relatively low cost.
>>>
>>> ===================================================
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|