Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change

To: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>, <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change
From: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:20:08 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Good deal for K8JHR. The small Utah town I live in requires a permit for the 
tower foundation, everything else is unrestricted. Guess it helps to have a 
former ham in the building ordinance department. Our county and state are 
similarly unrestricted.
73, K7MEI



> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:08:27 -0700> From: n6kj.kelly@gmail.com> To: 
> cpwendling@yahoo.com> CC: TowerTalk@contesting.com; jruing@ameritech.net> 
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change> > 55 ft seems to be a 
> common number all around the country. It's> probably just like boilerplate 
> zoning ordinances and boilerplate> CC&Rs. Someone picked that number long ago 
> and others just followed> suit. I could point to a handful of cities in my 
> area with 55 ft.> limits. I'm fortunate that my city actually had a ham help 
> craft> their ordinance and thus we DO have a 65 ft limit instead of 55.> > > 
> On 8/12/08, Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com> wrote:> > Just curious as 
> to why 55 ft was chosen. Seems like 65ft (about 1 wavelength on 20m)> >> > 
> which would allow a good low angle radiation pattern on 14Mhz, would be> > 
> better for hams. I wonder if they thought about reasonable ham> > 
> requirements for emergency communications, etc. when they picked that> > 
> number?> >> >> >> > CW-A
 I4MI> >> > --- On Tue, 8/12/08, Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> wrote:> > 
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>> > Subject: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a 
change> > To: TowerTalk@contesting.com> > Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 11:19 
AM> >> > Greetings TowerTalkians => >> > Good news and bad news:> >> > The Good 
News... my city allows towers and> > antennas, and there are NO PERMITS and> > 
NO INSPECTIONS !!> >> > The Bad News is there is a limit of 55 feet.> >> > 
Fortunately, that suits my plans and my budget, so I do not> > have to fight 
City Hall to get permission go higher.> > At least not yet...> >> > So... up to 
a height of 55 feet, it is, essentially, unregulated.> > Cool, eh? Can ya dig 
it? Unbelievable.> >> > [I figure you guys might understand my glee...picture 
me> > giggling a dirty-old-man-kind-of-laugh under my breath all> > day like I 
know a dirty little secret no else knows... ;-)> >> > =========== Richards -- 
K8JHR ================> >> > _______________________
 ________________________> >> >> >> > 
_______________________________________________> > TowerTalk mailing list> > 
TowerTalk@contesting.com> > 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk> > 
_______________________________________________> >> >> >> > 
_______________________________________________> > TowerTalk mailing list> > 
TowerTalk@contesting.com> > 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk> >> 
_______________________________________________> > > > 
_______________________________________________> TowerTalk mailing list> 
TowerTalk@contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>