Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas
From: Tom Cox <tomcox@iquest.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:12:13 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The consensus on the antenneX antenna discussion lists, and in several 
articles in the magazine (www.antennex.com) is that the Isotron and 
similar devices (the EH, the CFA, etc.) are, at best, a means of 
terminating a coax such that common mode current on the outside of the 
shield of a sufficiently long feed line actually does the radiating. 
Placing a choke balun at the feed point of such devices generally 
reduces their effectiveness to the dummy-load/incandescent light bulb 
performance bracket, confirming that view.

If they are sold as defying the laws of physics, as some are, they're 
snake oil. If you understand from the beginning that you are going to 
rely on feed line radiation to operate such an "antenna" (if you can 
even call it that), and you can meet the installation conditions to make 
that work, AND if it satisfies your needs, go for it.

In other words: Caveat emptor!

73,
Tom, KT9OM


towertalk-request@contesting.com wrote:
> Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
>       towertalk@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       towertalk-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       towertalk-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Isotron Antennas (K7LXC@aol.com)
>    2. tall crank-up tower post? (David J Windisch)
>    3. Re: tall crank-up tower post? (Mirko S57AD)
>    4. Re: Isotron Antennas (Bill MacLane)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:15:49 EST
> From: K7LXC@aol.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas
> To: towertalk@contesting.com, n4zr@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <c48.2bb90b7b.36dc1cc5@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>  
> In a message dated 3/1/2009 8:29:16 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
> towertalk-request@contesting.com writes:
>
>   
>>  It is a joke - much less effective than one of the MFJ  compact loop 
>>     
> antennas, or the original compact loop if you can find  one.
> I remember that KA9FOX won Sweepstakes low power one year from  Puerto 
> Rico using one of the originals.
>  
>     Well, the efficiency surely is very low but Tom  Schiller, N6BT, wrote an 
> article a couple of years ago about making QSOs using  a 100W lightbulb for 
> an antenna. Bottom line? Just about anything will radiate  - even a lightbulb 
> and even an Isotron.
>  
> Cheers,
> Steve    K7LXC
> TOWER TECH 
>
>
>
>  
> **************Get a jump start on your taxes. Find a tax professional in your 
> neighborhood today. 
> (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=Tax+Return+Preparation+%26+Filing&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000004)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:57:25 -0500
> From: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] tall crank-up tower post?
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <1BD1421A88AA4F82A33D61CEEEE4B7CB@DavidJWindisPC>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Searched unsuccessfully for a post  within the last 2 years (I think) 
> regarding 5 specially-built 100-foot-plus crank-ups with large wind-load 
> capacity fully-extended.  Any help out there, please?
>
> Tia & 73 Dave W8FGX
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:17:02 +0100
> From: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] tall crank-up tower post?
> To: David J Windisch <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <49AADF2E.20304@amis.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> You meant Luso towers (www.luso.us)?
>
> 73  Mirko, S57AD
> David J Windisch pravi:
>   
>> Searched unsuccessfully for a post  within the last 2 years (I think) 
>> regarding 5 specially-built 100-foot-plus crank-ups with large wind-load 
>> capacity fully-extended.  Any help out there, please?
>>
>> Tia & 73 Dave W8FGX
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:45:58 -0800 (PST)
> From: Bill MacLane <ai4wm@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas
> To: Tower Talk <towertalk@contesting.com>, WA6RKN <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>
> Message-ID: <351009.14370.qm@web57907.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> These make nice light shows at night other than that they do not work worth a 
> hoot.? Maybe at low power like 5 or 10 watts they'd work, but the 
> inefficiency will eat up that small amount of power.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill
>
> AI4WM
>
> --- On Sat, 2/28/09, WA6RKN <WA6RKN@ARRL.net> wrote:
> From: WA6RKN <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas
> To: "Tower Talk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009, 11:10 AM
>
> If you gentle readers would bear with me while I take an excursion into some 
> antenna type questions....
>
> Specifically, the Isotron Antenna.
>
> Being a skeptic, this antenna sounds too good to be true..
>
> So..I ask you folk..Opinions?  Thoughts....good or bad.....
>
> (Or any suggestions of a small footprint antenna for use from an apartment 
> landing.  This one caught my attention as one could BS the apartment 
> management and say it was a fancy sat dish.  They wouldn't know the 
> difference.  LOL)
>
> Limited area for an HF antenna and severe restrictions necessitates the 
> search and questions.
>
> Dipoles and other wire antennas are out.  Verticals are pretty much out as 
> well.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Joe Wolfe
> WA6RKN 
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
>       
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 75, Issue 2
> ****************************************
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>