Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole
From: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:52:17 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Is the BA-8 that much different than the BA-58's?

The '58 does decouple the feed line from the vertical dipole arrays by my 
field observation, and that is why I use them.  The routing on the feed line 
is:

Dipole feed point
BA-58 balun
RG-8X feed line routed to parasitic (reflector) element guy point
follow guy rope to ground
connect to RG-213

de Paul, W8AEF

ZF2JI/ZF2TA  FO8DX/FO8PLA  8Q7AA  XZ0A  VU7RG  TX5C




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Balun For Dipole


> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:41:11 -0700, Paul Playford wrote:
>
>>I'm not a balun expert, but would recommend you try the Palomar BA-8.
>> I've been using them here.
>
> I AM a balun expert, and I don't recommend them at all. They are a total
> rip-off!  Overpriced and ineffective. So they don't blow up. But they 
> don't
> do anything useful either.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim Brown K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>