Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.

To: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.
From: "Bill Aycock" <baycock@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Bill Aycock <baycock@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:48:09 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Dan-
As far as I remember, every "fairy book" scheme antenna (CF, EH, etc) has 
made this claim. Whenever I see it, I assume it is related to an RF Ponzi 
scheme, and prepare to laugh. The kicker in this one is "Time Diversity".
73-Bill-W4BSG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.


>> To really help, try modeling a real cage? The pertinent
>> dimensions are easy to get, and a dipole for comparison should be easy.
>
>
> According to the website, that will not work:
>
> "Okay those with antenna modeling program will differ because their 
> program
> will not allow all the parameters to be taken into account...So with 
> actual
> testing we rate a cage 5 dbd over a standard dipole "
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>