Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Gem Quad Back in Production

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Gem Quad Back in Production
From: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-to: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:57:21 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>Anyone have any experience with the Gem Quad design and its durability?

I used a 3L with it's boom at 58' for roughly 6 1/2 years at a previous QTH. 

First, the durability ... never lost a spreader or a corner insulator, worked 
well.
BTW, one of the 'secrets' is the interconnecting of each element with thin rods.

Design ... the tuning stubs for me were NOT a practical solution, I went with
preset lengths <translation: "best guess at the time"> and well, it 'worked'.

Good F/B on 20m and 10m ... not so much on 15m. Be a good project for
someone to go back and revisit with today's modeling software for solutions?

Biggest problem I fought was the mounting point of the loops to the individual
feedlines breaking due to flexing in the wind ... that was a pain to repair at 
first.

Final arrangement used a support tube/spreader and individual gamma matches 
per band. That setup reduced the frequency of repairs by a large margin for me.

Even the largest model is still very light as to tower loading and rotor needs.

I still have the 3L and also a 2L stored away for another day perhaps ... or ...

73 de Billy, AA4NU



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>