Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

To: "'Tower and HF antenna construction topics.'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
From: "Tommy" <aldermant@windstream.net>
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:07:37 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
And I don't think you are the moderator of this reflector Jim, so lighten
up!!

Tom - W4BQF



-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Hargrave
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 10:12 AM
To: Towertalk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender



   >-----Original Message-----
   >From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
   >[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Williams, Richard
   >(OAG/CPG)
   >Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 13:43
   >To: 'Tower and HF antenna construction topics.'
   >Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
   >
   >
   >This is getting as bad as the Logger32 reflector.

Hi Richard,

And what may I ask brings you to that conclusion?

If you have a beef about Logger32, please place it on the "Hamlogger"
reflector.
It is not appropriate to bad mouth it here.

   * 73's Jim W5IFP *
     w5ifp@gvtc.com









_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>