Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] What happened to the Fractal Design in Ham Antennas

To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] What happened to the Fractal Design in Ham Antennas
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:11:53 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

jimlux wrote:
> Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>   
>> Some time back there was an article in QST about Fractal Antennas and I 
>> believe they used one on 10 meters.
>> So far, searches find listings, but the pages have been blank.
>>
>> They'd be a limited space antenna with negative gain and are more often 
>> associated with cell phones
>>
>> Anything happening along this front and where did all the examples go?
>>
>> 73
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> Limited commercial viability (e.g. no big advantage over other shortened 
> antenna designs, so a lot more marketing sizzle than steak) and a patent 
> owner (Nathan Cohen) rumored to be litigious to boot.
>   
It seems like I remember some one creating quite a hassle on one of the 
reflectors a few years ago about the fractal design with at least one 
(or more) participant being invited to leave.

The litigious part would account for the vacant web sites. However if I 
remember patent law correctly even if something is patented you can 
build yourself a copy under some conditions, although why any one would 
want to is beyond me.

73

Roger (K8RI)

> fractenna.com
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>   
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>