I changed the subject line due to the AV640, but with the question of
the Guanella balun and the other experiments, maybe I should have left
it as it was?
On 5/22/2010 2:56 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 18:51:14 +0100, Steve Hunt wrote:
>
>
> I think that's what I said. If we recognize the Guanella balun as two
> common mode chokes, the differential voltage is across the common mode
> impedance of each core. Doing the math, for 1500 watts keydown, that's 275
> volts across 5,000 ohms, which is 15 watts. Applying a reasonable duty
> cycle for CW or SSB, that's something like 5 watts when you're
> transmitting.
>
>
So if I take to "individual" current baluns wound on #31 mix and connect
the inputs in parallel with the outputs in series, I have two
independent chokes with no common magnetic field serving as a 4:1
balun. Even though the chokes may be in very close proximity and even
on the same axis with say a half inch to inch spacing between them they
are still independent as the flux is contained almost entirely within
each individual core. If I understand that correctly that is the
difference between the Guanella balun and the experiments run by W8JI?
If this be the case, I wonder if replacing the conventional 4:1 balun in
the AV640 with this arrangement would *possibly* eliminate the power
limitations of the AV640 and particularly on 6 meters. At the least I'd
think it would certainly increase the power handling capability by a
notifiable amount. OTOH I've run the thing to 800 PEP on 6 with nary a
problem. I've also run the duty cycle on HF far beyond the listed
ratings with no problems.
73
Roger (K8RI)
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|