Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners

To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:50:01 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Steve,

Do you know if the plots were obtained with the roller inductor placed away 
from surrounding objects -- or placed within a metal cabinet?  The Q looks 
pretty pathetic above 40m.

Also, anyone know if Q improves toward 10m when using a roller inductor with 
a non-linear turns count that allows for more turns per unit of inductance 
at one end? (e.g., Cardwell 229 series)

http://www.cardwellcondenser.com/PAGES/md04g.html

Paul, W9AC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Hunt" <steve@karinya.net>
To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners


> That's a useful tuner simulation; but **DO** remember it assumes a
> constant Q for the inductor. Here's how a real roller inductor Q
> measures at different inductance settings on different bands:
>
> http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/temp/rollercoaster_q.png
>
> If you want to get meaningful loss results with that simulator, be
> prepared to manually change the default Q value as you change bands and
> change inductance values.
>
> 73,
> Steve G3TXQ
>
> On 28/11/2010 03:06, Jim W7RY wrote:
>> Now this is cool!
>>
>> http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/tuner/tuner.html
>>
>> 73
>> Jim W7RY
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>