Perhaps this will initiate some action to further expand the SSB segment of
the band down into part of the mostly unused cw segment. Long overdue in
my opinion.
How to make this antenna/tower relevant? Ahh, my 75/80m antenna will not
need as much bandwidth?
73,
Gerald K5GW
In a message dated 2/3/2011 5:23:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
jim.thom@telus.net writes:
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:08:33 -0500
From: ww3s@zoominternet.net
Subject: [TowerTalk] Intruder on 3985?
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <40989.1296677313@zoominternet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Anyone else copy this the last few nights? Was real strong in NW PA.
Wisconsin must have been hearing it, as they had to move a traffic net
to a different freq. Appeared to be speaking Russian, or perhaps an
eastern European language. It's AM....Who/how does something like
this get reported?
## 3900-4000 is the SW AM "75M" band. IE: we just lost 100 khz
of the top end of the 75m band for all intensive purposes. We have LOUD
chinese stations on 3925 here on the west coast...+ a few other freqs >
3900.
## Go to any of the sites of commercial SW AM broadcast TX and mating
amplifiers,
and they all include 3900-4000 khz.
## It's too bad in the end. One loud AM SW station will take out +/- 6
khz easily..so
each one of em cleans out 12 khz of the band.
Jim VE7RF
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|