Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160M antenna advise

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M antenna advise
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:24:56 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 2/7/2013 10:15 AM, Guy Molinari wrote:
Pros/Cons?

I like K1TTT's comments. But -- those grounded towers will interact with anything you put up, so be sure to include them in an NEC model. If the only ground for these towers are some rods, I'd add a load of about 20 ohms in series with their base to simulate ground losses. That interaction can be good or bad, and you can eliminate or reduce it by detuning the tower(s).

One way to use the tower(s) is to drive only one inverted L (or a Tee) and use one or both of the towers as passive elements. You could also load one or both of the towers, using the other as a passive element. These towers are tall enough, especially by the time you consider the aluminum on top, to feed pretty far above ground, which means that elevated radials at the feedpoint could be pretty efficient.

A tower will have the greatest effect as a passive element when it is near resonance, and when it has the lowest resistance to earth. That does not mean rods, it means radials.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>