> Does anyone know why or if there was some matching problem with
> the original design rods?
The newer beta rods have a sliding short and does not make use of
a hole tapped in the boom at a fixed point in order to permits
adjustment of the beta match when using the "174BA Option" (page 11
of the LJ-204BA.pdf manual on the Hy-Gain web site).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 8/24/2013 12:10 AM, Matt wrote:
I'm looking for some Hy-gain Long John info:
1. Has anyone retuned a 153BA for 12m operation and can provide their final
dimensional settings?
2. I have a pair of older 204BA's with the # 175121 beta rods (90 deg
bend). Hy-gain apparently changed the design to use the newer #179786 beta
rods (45 deg bend) although they apparently still use the #175121's on the
203BA's Does anyone know why or if there was some matching problem with
the original design rods?
Thanks for any info.
Matt
KM5VI
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|