Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] ROHN TOWER BOLTS UPDATE

To: Tom Nicholson <Gunsrus1942@Comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ROHN TOWER BOLTS UPDATE
From: Drax Felton <draxfelton@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:53:49 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Why even need one bolt?  Just during assembly?    Once the tower is guyed the 
downward weight holds it together.  When is there an upward force to seperate 
the sections? 

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 8, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Tom Nicholson <Gunsrus1942@Comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Jim's thoughts are the same as mine. Has anyone here purchased new tower 
> sections & if so, what size hardware did it come with? I suspect that the 
> larger hole is for alignment.
> 
> Tom W1ALZ
> 
> 
> 
>> On 5/8/2014 12:11 PM, J Chaloupka via TowerTalk wrote:
>> My idea, not fact.  In assembly to align the mismatch of the two members 
>> being bolted a tapered drift pin is used in the large hole to make for 
>> perfect alignment.  The smaller bolt is then inserted in it's hole and 
>> tightened.  The small bolt then holds the assembly in correct alignment for 
>> the large and necessary bolt to be inserted and be torqued to specification.
>> Why not use two large bolts?  Well to contain costs and only one bolt is 
>> necessary and further there may not be enough metal in the tower leg to 
>> allow for two bolts.  (two large bolts mean bolts too close to the edge of 
>> the metal etc, etc.
>> 
>> de JIM, WD8QBQ
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>