Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Mixing Rohn 20G and 25G

To: wv2zow@gmail.com, linuxmercedes@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Mixing Rohn 20G and 25G
From: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The last Rohn distributor price list showed 20G at the same price as 25G. 
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
GM Texas Towers
 
 
In a message dated 7/3/2014 10:41:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
wv2zow@gmail.com writes:

I can't  seem to find any 20G pricing (which makes sense, as it isn't
current  production). I'm curious -- how much cheaper was 20G vs 25G?
--Mike,  WV2ZOW


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Linux Mercedes  <linuxmercedes@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at  10:26 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT <
> K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>  wrote:
>
> > On 7/2/2014 8:38 PM, Linux Mercedes wrote:
>  >
> >> Is there a significant difference between guying and  bracketing a 
tower?
> >> I'd expect them to behave about the same,  but maybe house bracketing 
is
> >> more rigid since guys are  springy.
> >>
> >
> > There are too many  variables to say for sure, but if you have ever been
> on
> >  the roof of a single story home, next to a large chimney, you will be
>  > amazed at how much the house roof and walls move. On a house out in  
the
> > open you will see the roof move a couple of inches in a 30-40  mph wind.
> >  That was a well built home.  Many brackets  only guy in one axis and 
they
> > usually guy around 12 feet.   The wall holding the bracket should be
> > reinforced, but seldom  is.  Typically, by themselves, the wall will not
> > stand  against much wind until the house is completely enclosed.  I've
>  seen
> > a number of them fold up when the frame and roof were  completed.  There
> was
> > even a video on the net  recently.. IIRC they are not insured while 
under
> >  construction.
> >
> > Last photo on  http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/Dirt_Base.htm is a
> > house  btacket that attaches to a gable end consisting of 2 X 6s.
>  >
> > At best the bracket only raises the base about 12 feet.  Above that the
> > tower is free standing.  So you only gain  what ever height above 
ground,
> > the bracket is located.   Brackets located on an wall not reinforced
> doesn't
> > add  much stability.
>
>
> In that case, I am not too worried  about guying. I don't want to bracket
> the tower (I am renting so I'm  putting the tower somewhere far away from
> buildings so it can't fall  on them), but I will be borrowing your dirt 
base
> design with some  modifications.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
>  >> Alternatively, I hear that for short (~100 foot or less) 25G  towers,
> 1/4"
> >> EHS can be used instead of 3/16" EHS for  a more rigid tower without
> putting
> >> too much weight on  the legs. If flex is an issue, maybe that's the way
> to
>  >> go?
> >>
> >
> > For me, EHS is way to  heavy and larger is much more so.  Figure the
> weight
> >  for two or three level EHS guying.
> > I replace the 3/16" guys with  1/4" wire rope (which is not as heavy as
> > 1/4" EHS) and the extra  weight and tension caused the bottom two 
sections
> > to "bell" out  between the two bolts in each leg, requiring a jack to 
get
> > them  apart.  The stronger and heavier guys require more tension which
>  > translates to more down force,
> >
>
> Wait, so  3/16" EHS is heavier than 1/4" wire rope? I do want to avoid
> permanent  tower damage as I'd like to be able to take down and sell the
> tower  when I'm done with it.
>
>
> >
> > I much prefer  Phillystran which is far lighter and I've never, in 13
> years
>  > noted any stretch problems and I've bee "up there" in winds far  higher
> than
> > I should have been.  I figure 20G is  about half the rating of 25G while
> > others figure 75%.  To me  the lighter construction with wider spacing 
on
> > smaller braces  along with thinner tubing for lega makes a substantial.
>  >
>
>  I'd love to use Phillystran but it is incredibly  expensive compared to
> 3/16" EHS.
>
>
> >
>  > The legs of a 25 G by themselves are not strong.(25G=16ga,  20G=18ga)
>  They
> > depend on the braces for strength.I  much prefer to err on the safe 
side.
>  I
> > figure, by  the time you get 20G engineered to satisfy the insurance
> > company,  or codes if applicable, you could have purchased and 
installed a
> >  45G.
> >
>
> That makes a lot of sense. The leg braces on  20G are thinner, too. If I 
use
> it at all, it'll be at the very top of  the tower.
>
>
> >
> > Had I known I wouldn't be  able to continuing to climb through my 70s, 
I'd
> > have found a way  to install a heavy duty 100' crank up instead of the
> 100'
> >  45G.  To me, going up needs to be safe, with a good safety margin.   I 
use
> > guy brackets and do not tie guys to tower legs so the whole  tower
> receives
> > the sideways/lateral force, not just one  leg. If you do not use a pier
> pin
> > base, wing transfers a  lateral force to the back side (side away from
> wind)
>  >  and an upward force to the front side (side on which the wind  
impinges).
>
>
> Fortunately I'm young and stupid so I'm not  too worried about tower
> climbing. I do need to pick up a guy bracket  for the middle bay; I was
> debating making my own since Rohn wants  something outrageous for theirs,
> but I'll probably pick up one from  Norm's Fab as they're a bit cheaper 
and
> I don't have to spend the time  designing it myself. Fortunately, the 
tower
> I was given came with a  flat top that has loops for guy wires built into
>  it.
>
>
> >
> >
> >  Although if  leg weight loading is a concern, I guess I should work out
> >>  how much downforce a 20G section can support, since it'll be less than
>  25G.
> >>
> >>
> > 18Ga Vs 16ga  (3,900#  for 18ga 20G.  I don't have a figure for 25G)
>  >
>
> Neat. 20G will collapse before the 3/16" EHS guys you'd  use on it will
> break. I guess that is why it's not recommended for  much!
>
>
> >
> > 73
> >
> >  Roger (K8RI)
> >
> >
> >
> >   --Nathan
> >>
> >> On 07/01/2014 10:32 PM, Wayne Kline  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Two levels of guy is what my  concern would be. I am in as now and be
> >>> home in PA next  week.
> >>> I have a library or Rohn catalogs and in the older  ones I have the 
full
> >>> spec on r 25 -G.
>  >>> But if my gray matter serves me well  R 25- Gg is not  suitable for
> >>> guying let alone two levels .
>  >>> And this was the old spec. So with out a house bracket your  walking 
on
> >>> thin ice.
> >>>
>  >>> YMMV
> >>>
> >>> Wayne W3EA
>  >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPad
>  >>>
> >>> On Jul 1, 2014, at 6:24 PM, "Linux Mercedes"  
<linuxmercedes@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
>  >>>
> >>>  Wayne,
>  >>>>
> >>>> I'll primarily be using it for  wireless internet. Unfortunately, the
> >>>> tech at the  WISP I spoke to was pretty vague about the wind load of
> the
>  >>>> antenna they'll be using, but he assured me it would be  'minimal' 
and
> >>>> didn't think it would be that big of a  concern.
> >>>>
> >>>> I won't be house  bracketing this install, but it will be guyed at 
two
> >>>>  levels (what Rohn recommends for 50' of 25G).
> >>>>
>  >>>> --Nathan
> >>>>
> >>>> On  07/01/2014 09:59 AM, Wayne Kline wrote:
> >>>>
>  >>>>> I also have experience with 20-G and 25-G towers... @ my  station 
my
> >>>>> 2mter/450 MHZ  and one 6 meter  beam
> >>>>>   5 element 14' boom  are on  at 36ft. an consist of  3 sections of
> >>>>> 20-G  and a top of 25-G  AG3 ?   it's house bracketed @ 18  ft.
> >>>>> Been in place for 24 years  BUT   extremely light wind load.
> >>>>>
>  >>>>> IMHO  @ HF  a C-3. TA33  or A3 would be  the BIGGEST  .
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  So my question to you is WHAT are you planning to adorn the tower
>  with
> >>>>> ?
> >>>>>
>  >>>>> Wayne W3EA   . .
>  >>>>>
> >>>>>
>  >>>>>  Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 07:42:14 -0500
>  >>>>>> From: kkbroadcastengineering@gmail.com
>  >>>>>> CC: towertalk@contesting.com
>  >>>>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Mixing Rohn 20G and  25G
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  Nathan,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I  would caution you to not mix the sections nor even use the 20 
for
>  >>>>>> anything more than VERY light duty use.
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With that  said...  Back in my younger days when I did a lot of 
tower
>  >>>>>> work
> >>>>>> for CB and Ham  operators, there were a number of mixed 20/25 
towers
>  >>>>>> supporting large CB antennas and they stayed up many  years.  I do
> >>>>>> recall
>  >>>>>> working on one where the 20 top section physically  broke during a
> wind
> >>>>>> storm.
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Climbing a mixed  20/25 tower is a real pain as the steps are
> different
>  >>>>>> distances apart.
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Good luck,
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Kevin C. Kidd,  CSRE/AMD
> >>>>>> AM Ground Systems Company   -  WD4RAT
> >>>>>> kkidd@kkbc.com  --   866-22-RADIO -- 866-227-2346
> >>>>>>  www.amgroundsystems.com
> >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014  at 7:42 PM, Linux Mercedes <
> >>>>>>  linuxmercedes@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  Hello,
>  >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Whilst  moving tower sections from the shed to the shop so I could
>  >>>>>>> clean
> >>>>>>> them  up and make a couple of fixes before putting up my tower, I
>  >>>>>>> noticed
> >>>>>>> that  some of them seemed lighter than others. Turns out I've got 
a
>  >>>>>>> mix of
> >>>>>>> 20G  and 25G sections.
> >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> What are your thoughts on putting up, say, 30 or  40 feet of 25G 
and
> >>>>>>> then
>  >>>>>>> another 20 or 10 feet of 20G? I'd like to use the  best sections 
I
> >>>>>>> have on
>  >>>>>>> the tower, but if mixing is a no, then I'll fix  up some of the
> other
> >>>>>>> sections I  have and build a homogeneous tower.
>  >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Nathan
>  >>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>  >>>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>  >>>>>>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>  >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>   _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>  >>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>  >>>>>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>  >>>>>>
> >>>>>
>  >>>>> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>
> >>>>>
>  >>>>>
> >>>>>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>>  TowerTalk mailing list
> >>>>>  TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >>>>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>  >>>>>
> >>>>>   _______________________________________________
>  >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>  >>>> _______________________________________________
>  >>>> TowerTalk mailing list
> >>>>  TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >>>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>  >>>>
> >>>  _______________________________________________
> >>
>   &>>
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >> TowerTalk  mailing list
> >> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>  >>
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >
>  >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing  list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing  list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk  mailing  list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>