To: | "charlie@thegallos.com" <charlie@thegallos.com>, Don <w7wll@arrl.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] north |
From: | Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:36:16 -0500 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
WOW... I apologize to all TT'ers for kicking off this North finding facts. All the feedback are enlightening. With that now fleshed out.. another problem is rising it's ugly head A: The foul deterring OWL and it's installed position ? B: The Hue/color od the reflective Eye's ? I have opted for the deluxe http://www.gemplers.com/product/221414/Solar-powered-Owl-Rotating-Head and I am reading the TT for insight in banding the control lines to the tower . But at least the rotation head issue is no longer a concern :) Wayne W3EA > ...snip... > > I've obviously missed earlier discussion on the owl. I see a few refs to > > N. > > What am I missing? > > For those of us with a problem with birds perching on out antennas (what > is the max load of pigeons on a D-140? Anyone know?) it was suggested > that we put a plastic owl on our masts, but most have found it doesn't > work. Which lead to the discussion that the owl only works properly if it > points exactly towards true north. Hence needing a true north facing owl. > Of course, the way you do this is with a wench holding a wrench (folks > asking about a tower WINCH, but making the two most common typos) > > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] north, charlie |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] north, Don |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] north, charlie |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] north, Don |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |