Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter odditiy

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter odditiy
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 06:44:27 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
This is too small of a diameter change to notice any frequency difference.

John KK9A


To:     "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:        Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter odditiy
From:   "Ron W8RJL" <youngron@verizon.net>
Date:   Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:04:08 -0500

As noted in the handbook, K factor is important for antennas above 30 MHz
especially when using rod or tube for elements but any change in diameter
will have an impact even at 160 meters. I have made cage dipoles for 80
meters and the old tried and true 468/f in MHz does not work due to the K
factor. Agreed going from from 0.080 to 0.128 is a small change but you
can't say it is to small to make a difference. I still say prune the
antenna and don't worry about it.

Ron W8RJL

----- Original Message ----- From: <john@kk9a.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter odditiy


#12 wire is 0.080", #8 is 0.128.  This is not a big enough diameter change
to make a difference.

John KK9A

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>