Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ

To: StellarCAT <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>, n2ic@arrl.net, tower <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:38:29 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 3/15/2015 5:16 PM, StellarCAT wrote:
Hi Steve,

I’ve searched and cannot find any info on South Carolina other than that old 
map. It shows shows all of the area where I was as 8 mS.
There is indeed soil there – farming is going on all around there. And it shows 
the area in SC as 2.

There’s a really nice site:

http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

where I can go and indeed see that the soil where I was in AZ is actually 100 mS (1 
dS)! Not 8 but MUCH better. THAT I don’t know.


I tried to browse this site, but it appears to have a huge learning curve. Since you have used it, could you give us the Reader's
Digest version?  Specifically, are you saying it gives RF conductivity
and permittivity?  Or DC conductivity?  Or does it just rate
soils for agricultural value?  Agriculture doesn't necessarily
correlate with radio.  My QTH has great radio characteristics but
is useless for farming.  Even weeds don't grow well.  Thanks in
advance.

73

Rick N6RK

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>